Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAO Sophia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 2 | PUOPOLO Mia | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | ZHOU Sophia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 3 | HWANG Chanel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 1% | |
| 5 | OLSEN Jen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 6 | LIN Victoria T. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 7 | RICHARDS Ella | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 8 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 9 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | COELHO Sofia | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 11 | VAYNBERG Ellen | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 12 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 13 | YANIV Liya | 1% | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 14 | GREENLEAF Ella | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | LI Yixin Catherine | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | POWLEDGE Cora | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | GAO Zhuning | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 18 | LIAO Jiarou | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
| 19 | WANG Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 20 | VAN DE VELDE Cecile | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | HAQUE Isabela | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | YURKSTAS Elle | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 23 | HAYNES Alicia | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 17% | |
| 24 | RIZAL Ojaswee (Oju) | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | ANDERSON Shannon | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | BALDWIN Aimi | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% |
| 27 | RYDMAN Grace | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | YEE Melania | 11% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | PANNONE Elisa | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | CUSOLITO Jacklyn | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BURNHAM Clarice | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | DEEKEN Anna | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | LUNEAU Isabel | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | TENZIN Kyijong | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | IREZ Lyra | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | BUSH-NICKERSON Ashley | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FENTON Barbara R. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.