Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Thomas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
2 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
3 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
3 | SETO Jing | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
5 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
6 | CAFASSO Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | |
7 | SWIERZEWSKI Tomasz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
8 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
9 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
10 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% | |
11 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% | |
12 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
13 | KANG Eunchan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | STEIN Philip | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 3% | |
15 | MARTONE Matt L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 18% | |
15 | MACDONALD James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
17 | YU Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
18 | SPRINGER Elijah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
18 | BURNHAM Mark | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
20 | HERRICK Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
21 | VINE Ross | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | KEYO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
24 | JACKSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | |
25 | LIBERT Zachariah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
26 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
27 | TARDIFF Seth | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
28 | CIGNA Connor | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | LIN Yufei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
30 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
31 | LISANKE Victor | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | DANG Timmy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | VELAMAKANNI Advith | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
34 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
35 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
36 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
37 | DEVINE Colin | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
39 | LI Ray | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
40 | TEREB Daniel | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
41 | PANAS Mason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
42 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
43 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
44 | ARRISON James (Jamie) A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
45 | MILGRAM Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% | |
46 | BUTTS Brendan | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 60% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
48 | DANIS Owen | 100% | 98% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | |
49 | BENTLEY Ethan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
50 | WOLFORD Benjamin | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
51 | HOPKE Ben | 100% | 98% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.