Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 2 | RYAN Kai | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | CHENG Brandon | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | BADUSHOV Anton | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 5 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | LAUB William | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | ROLLOCK Jonathan B. | V V D V V D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 8 | DRZEWICZEWSKI Sean | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | EPLETT Nicholas | V V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 10 | FLUECKIGER Michael | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | TAUER Sam | D D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | PANNOZZO Luca | V D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 13 | ZONG Yujie | V V D V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 14 | COUNTS Nicholas | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | PODDAR Shameek | V D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | COURTIN Frederic | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | CHIN Nigel | V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | DZIALO George A. | V V V D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 19 | DAHL Chris | D V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | JAVIDI Michael | D V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 21 | TOUSSAINT Alexander | D D V D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 22 | ZISLIN Benjamin | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 23 | JOHNSON Colin | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | AISSIS John G. | D V D V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 25 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | V D V D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 26 | STEVENSON David | V D D D V D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 27 | DUARTE PALOMINO Miguel | D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 28 | SMITH Adam | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 29 | GORMLEY Peter J. | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 30 | ANSARI Umayr | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | HORAN Daniel J. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | AVRAMIS Adam | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | MCCALL Aidan | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | IDE Ben | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.