Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DU Eiry | - | - | 2% | 15% | 49% | 35% |
2 | SIU Maple | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
3 | HOAGLAND Sally | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
3 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
5 | PAN Angela | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 19% | |
6 | HOOPER Lucy | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
7 | SEREGIN Katya | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
8 | SKLAR Davida | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
9 | PARSONS Mischa | - | 5% | 31% | 48% | 16% | |
10 | SIU Hazel | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
11 | RYDMAN Grace | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
13 | CAFASSO Sabrina | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
14 | SAMMON-BURNS Sylvia | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | |
15 | BASU Avneeta | 2% | 18% | 42% | 33% | 5% | |
16 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | BRODEUR Andrea | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
18 | ZUCKER Emily A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
19 | SUMMERER Jordan | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
20 | TIBBETTS Lily | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
21 | MARCHANT Morgan R. | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
22 | ANDERSON Madeline | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
23 | NGUYEN Celena | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 10% | |
24 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
25 | GERBOTH Lauren | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
26 | BURNHAM Sarah | 4% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
27 | ALVAREZ Letizia | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.