Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 2 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
| 3 | SEMEL Liana M. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% |
| 3 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 32% |
| 5 | WANG Ellen | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 34% |
| 6 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 7 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 43% | 10% | |
| 8 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% |
| 9 | BREKER Anika | - | - | - | 8% | 43% | 49% | |
| 10 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 4% |
| 11 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 32% | 5% | |
| 12 | GU Emily | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 14 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 53% | 27% | |
| 15 | WANG Yudi | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% |
| 17 | FU Qihan | - | 2% | 18% | 54% | 24% | 3% | |
| 18 | DU Hannah | - | - | 16% | 46% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 19 | BECKER Elena | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 20 | MEYER Claudia | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 21 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | RENTON Samantha | - | - | 5% | 29% | 46% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | WANG Sabrina | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | WANG Chloe | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MUSTO Isabella | 11% | 52% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | LAO Sophia | 1% | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 29 | WANG Jasmine | - | 3% | 49% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | OLSEN Jen | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | SHA Yi Ling | 3% | 30% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | YANIV Liya | 35% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | COELHO Sofia | 38% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | CHARALEL Jessica | 2% | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 19% | 74% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | HWANG Chanel | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | ANDERSON Shannon | 39% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BASSIK Judith M. | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | FENTON Barbara R. | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 78% | 22% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.