Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | SHEN Lydia | V V V D V | V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | SEMEL Liana M. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | WANG Ellen | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 7 | LIU Angel(Daying) | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | XUE Alanna L. | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 9 | BREKER Anika | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | WU Julianna Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | GU Emily | D V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | CARTER Jane P. | V V V V D D | V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
| 14 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | WANG Yudi | V D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | D V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 17 | FU Qihan | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 18 | DU Hannah | D D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | BECKER Elena | V D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | MEYER Claudia | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | V V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | RENTON Samantha | V D D V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 23 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | V D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 24 | WANG Sabrina | D V D V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 25 | WANG Chloe | D D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | MUSTO Isabella | D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | LAO Sophia | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | ZHOU Catherine | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | WANG Jasmine | D V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | OLSEN Jen | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | SHA Yi Ling | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | YANIV Liya | D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | COELHO Sofia | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | CHARALEL Jessica | D D V D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 35 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | D V D D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 36 | HWANG Chanel | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 37 | ANDERSON Shannon | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 38 | BASSIK Judith M. | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 39 | FENTON Barbara R. | D D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 40 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | D D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.