Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 3 | KOEHN Ted | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 5 | OLIVARES Frets G. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 7 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 9 | CHO Michael | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | POWERS Douglas A. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | YANG David | V V V V V D | V D | 1.3 | 5 | +3.7 |
| 13 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | POPOKH Leo | D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | SUAREZ Rolando | D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | PHILLIPS Jasper | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | WU Clarence C. | V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 18 | KRYLTSOV Greg | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 19 | VALENTINE Iain | D V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | BORG Daniel | D D D V V V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 21 | GREENLEAF John | D V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | D V V V D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 23 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 24 | RUSANOV Oleg | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | PAPP Mike | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | TOWSTER Robert | D D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | WEIL Brent | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | BERGER Jamie | D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | THOGERSEN Eric J. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 33 | ALLAN Peter L. | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 34 | CHAO Pierre | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | ORNELAS Polo | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 36 | WEMPLE Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 37 | O'CONNOR Ryan (Ryan O'Connor) D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 37 | ZAIDI Sohail | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.