National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Div III Women's Saber

Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 TABANGAY Heartlyn V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.3 6 +0.7
2 GAUTAM Sahana V V V D V V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
3 DENG Brooke V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
3 HUANG Rachael V V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
5 TESTROET Aubrey V V V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
6 CHO Michelle D V V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
7 RAMIREZ Mirka A. D D V V V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
8 GOLDIN Nina V D D V V D V V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
9 MERCHANT Aishwarya V V V V V V V V D 3.3 6 +2.7
10 FAN Grace V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
11 MALEK Zolie V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
12 SEAL Cameron I. D V V V V V V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
13 WILSON Eva D V V V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
14 DUDNICK Morgan D D V V D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
15 ISBERG Natalie D V D V V D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
16 FREY Sarah E. D V D V D V V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
17 MANN Sophia J. V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
18 NAYAK Esha V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 YAM Danika V D V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 SCHAIBLE Sofia L. V V V V V D V D 3.6 5 +1.4
21 REGANTI Sitara V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
22 LEE Lauren D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
23 CHIANG Melissa V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
24 MONTORIO Lily M. V D V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
24 CHEN Kevy V V V V D D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
24 GARRETT Madrid V V V D V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
27 ZHENG Valentina D V V V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
28 GOLOVITSER Maya V V D V V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
29 BROWNER June D V V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
30 STONE Coral V D D D V V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
31 ONG Lauren V D D V D V V D 1.2 2 +0.8
32 SIDDIQUI Reem D D V D V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
33 CHI Claire V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
34 GRAJALES Hannah E. V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
35 DHAR Layla V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
36 NAYAK Anika V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
37 IYER Arushi V V V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
38 PABIAN Emilia V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
38 CHAN Kayla V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
40 LI Alexis V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
41 CHAVAN Arya V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
42 CHIN Elise V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
43 SHEARER Alena D D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 LUKER Hannah V V V D V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
45 MANKOVA Varvara D V D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
46 PRAXL Alexa R. D D V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
47 JEFFORDS Sophia D V V V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
47 BRODERICK Kylin V V V D D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
49 GOSAVI Aabolee V V D V V D V D 1.8 4 +2.2
50 CHEN Elaine V V V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
51 COLBY Mercer V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
52 TERP Lucy D D V V V V D 0.7 3 +2.3
53 CARLUCCI Laura A. D D D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
54 ADAMS Morrigan B. D D D V V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
55 FENG Alicia G. D D D V V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
56 MYAT Chloe D V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
57 KORINTH Jacqueline V D V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
58 LISSO Ria A. V D D D V V D 4.6 2 -2.6
59 NICHOLAS Eva D V D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
60 HOLMES Sabrina D D V V D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
61 ZHAN Sophie V D D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
62 BUCKHOUSE Talia V D V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
63 BENT Sarah V D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
64 YOUNG Audrey V D D D D D V D 3.6 1 -2.6
65 PALMIERI Giuliana M. V V D D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 BAROUCH Susanna V V D D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 TODD Phoebe V V V V D D D 3.9 4 +0.1
68 BAINS Nandini V V D V D D 1.5 3 +1.5
69 XU Emily T. V D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
70 LITTLE Avery D V D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
71 TREACY Aisling V D D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 CAO Sophie V V V D D D D 2.7 3 +0.3
73 KINKADE Ellie V V D D V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
74 BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara V V V D D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 VANCE Beth S. V D D V V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
76 VILD Grace V D D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
77 DEBERTIN Beth V D D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
78 KIM Caitlin D D V V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
79 NGUYEN Madeleine D D D V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
80 SCHICK Veronica D V V D V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
81 NAIR Supriya V D D V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
82 GOURNEAU Sophie L. D V V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
83 LEUNG Ashlyn K. D V V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
84 HERMAN Sabrina D V D V D D 0.9 2 +1.1
85 SUHALIM Maree D V V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
86 MCNALLY Teagan D D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
87 SCHOEW Margot V D V D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
88 NEUMAN Ella D V V D D D D 3.7 2 -1.7
89 PAINE Lily V D V D D D D 5.2 2 -3.2
90 ASHTIANI Shaya V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
91 LIU Hannah D D V V D D D 2.0 2 -
92 VANKIRK Avery D V D D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
93 CHOI Sophie Grace D D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
94 WODISKA Ava V D D D D V D 0.3 2 +1.7
95 MORGAN Lily D D D D V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
96 SHELLEY Scarlett D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 LABRECQUE Savannah D V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
98 BANGALORE Shriya V D D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
99 EGAN Caroline D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
100 SAJAN Anita D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
101 DUCKETT Retta D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
101 FORD-BURRIS Zooey D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
103 BAIK Madeline D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
103 VERWEST Melissa D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 SNOAD Indy D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
106 WHITESIDES Abigail E. V D D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
106 MARTIN Audrey D D D D D V 1.1 1 -0.1
106 HOAGLAND Simone D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
109 ABDULLAHI Saara D D D V D D 0.9 1 +0.1
110 SEELIG Samantha D D D D D V 1.7 1 -0.7
111 RANJAN Diya D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
112 LAZO Emily D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
113 DUCKETT Leighton D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
114 CHOW Caitlyn D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
115 PREIMESBERGER Elaine D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
116 CHANG Julia D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
117 DONDERIS Katherine D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
117 FOURNIER Madison D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 SIMS Addy D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
120 RIESTERER Katherine D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
121 WHITLEY Alexis D D D D D D 2.9 0 -2.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.