Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 2 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 3 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | LONG Jessie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 5 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 6 | JIANG Evelyn | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 7 | WANG Emily | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | MAK Jayden | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 9 | XU Elaine | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | YU Skylar | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 11 | ZHU Avril | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHANG Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 13 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 15 | WANG Tina | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
| 16 | HU Heidi | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 17 | HU Ashley | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 18 | BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | PATEL Maia | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | CHEN Cindy | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | KIM Grace | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 22 | SCHMIDT Yehna | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Summer | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 24 | MULLER Inara | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | YU Stella | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | CHOI Charlotte | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 27 | KIM Saeren | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 28 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 29 | BURGESS Brees | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | STANLEY Garance | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 33 | DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 34 | CHANG Kaitlyn | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 35 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 36 | CLAIANU Adriana | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BRIMMER Bella | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | HWANG Sophie | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | CAI Joanna | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
| 40 | LONG Chloe | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 41 | WANG April | 7% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% |
| 43 | FAN Tina | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 44 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | SUTHERLAND Sadie | 14% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | YANG Felicia | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BEATEY Piper | 2% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MERRITT Annabelle | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | YOUNG Sienna | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 50 | WANG Keira | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEE Elise | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | KATZ Emma | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 53 | QIU Abigail | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% | |
| 54 | POWERS Waverly | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 55 | CHANG Kylie | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 56 | OLESKY Ellie | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 57 | BABB Virginia | 15% | 43% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | BOLTON Faith | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 59 | CONG Catherine | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | CHI Alicia | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LIU Adelina | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHACKO Anne | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 66 | SHAW Annabelle | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | - |
| 67 | MULAY Arya | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 68 | PARAISO Isabella | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | SHI Maxine | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 69 | CHANG Grace | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | GUO YUKI | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 71 | HILE Violet | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 73 | CHENG Anna | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 74 | WU Amelie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 75 | CORD Sophia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 76 | MEADE Kaia G. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 78 | ESTEVES ZOE | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | WEI Levana | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 80 | MALUKI Nia | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 81 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 82 | SMITH Genevieve | 43% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | BAO Amelia | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 83 | TANG Athena | 47% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | SCHAMBERGER Amelia | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | KANIA Brigitte | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 87 | BRAN ROSADO Victoria | 43% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 88 | WINSLOW Zaria | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | MADAMINOVA Ariadna | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | KIM Erin Sihyo | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | CORTEZ Hadley Kate | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 92 | ZHAO Audrey | < 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.