Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 2 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 3 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 3 | LONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
| 5 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 6 | JIANG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
| 7 | WANG Emily | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | MAK Jayden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | XU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | YU Skylar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 11 | ZHU Avril | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 13 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | REN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
| 15 | WANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
| 16 | HU Heidi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 17 | HU Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | PATEL Maia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 20 | CHEN Cindy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | KIM Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 22 | SCHMIDT Yehna | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Summer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 24 | MULLER Inara | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | YU Stella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 27 | KIM Saeren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 28 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 29 | BURGESS Brees | 100% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 32 | STANLEY Garance | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 33 | DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 34 | CHANG Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 35 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 36 | CLAIANU Adriana | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BRIMMER Bella | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | HWANG Sophie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | CAI Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% | |
| 40 | LONG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 41 | WANG April | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
| 43 | FAN Tina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 44 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | SUTHERLAND Sadie | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | YANG Felicia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BEATEY Piper | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MERRITT Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 49 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 50 | WANG Keira | 100% | 91% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEE Elise | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | KATZ Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 53 | QIU Abigail | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
| 54 | POWERS Waverly | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 55 | CHANG Kylie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 56 | OLESKY Ellie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 57 | BABB Virginia | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | BOLTON Faith | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 59 | CONG Catherine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 62 | CHI Alicia | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LIU Adelina | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHACKO Anne | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 66 | SHAW Annabelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 67 | MULAY Arya | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | PARAISO Isabella | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | SHI Maxine | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 69 | CHANG Grace | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | GUO YUKI | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 71 | HILE Violet | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 73 | CHENG Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 74 | WU Amelie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 75 | CORD Sophia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 76 | MEADE Kaia G. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 78 | ESTEVES ZOE | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | WEI Levana | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 80 | MALUKI Nia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 81 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 82 | SMITH Genevieve | 100% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | BAO Amelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 83 | TANG Athena | 100% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | SCHAMBERGER Amelia | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | KANIA Brigitte | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 87 | BRAN ROSADO Victoria | 100% | 57% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 88 | WINSLOW Zaria | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | MADAMINOVA Ariadna | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | KIM Erin Sihyo | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | CORTEZ Hadley Kate | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 92 | ZHAO Audrey | 100% | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.