Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 5 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 6 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 7 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 8 | WU Vincent | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 53% |
| 10 | BAERENWALD Tybalt Wolfram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 11 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 12 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 13 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 13 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 15 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 16 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 17 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 18 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 19 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 20 | BRISENO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | ZILLER Rowan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 23 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 24 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 25 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 26 | GRABOWSKI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 27 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 8% |
| 29 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 30 | LIU Jayden | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 31 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 32 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 33 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 34 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 35 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 36 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 37 | HO Alden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 38 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | BURRES stuart | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 42 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 15% | |
| 43 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 44 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 46 | CHOU Qianhao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 47 | KIM Eric | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GUO Youwei | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 52 | KAMURA Kosei | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | VO Blake | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | KIM Junseong | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
| 55 | LI Ryan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 56 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | RABEL Sebastian | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 59 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 60 | BROOKS Theo | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | JI Derek | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | DENG Richard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 63 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 93% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | LEE Blake | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 65 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 66 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 67 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 67 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 69 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 71 | KIM Mason | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 72 | CHIANG Tyson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 73 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | CHOW Tyson J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 75 | YUAN Alan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 76 | RABEL Alexander | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | JAVIER Xavier | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 78 | MAI Ryan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | LYU Tyler | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 80 | HAGN Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 81 | QI Zach | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | BABY Henry | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 83 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | CHANG William | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 86 | BROOKS Isaac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 87 | CROOKS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 88 | LU Simon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 89 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 90 | VALLETTA John “JD” | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 91 | LO Lei | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 91 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 93 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 94% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 94 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | FAVO Christopher | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 96 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 97 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 98 | SALMAN Ibrahim | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 99 | NORTON Hudson | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 99 | CAO HAOTIAN | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 101 | GUAN Dylan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | RINALDI Benigno | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 103 | ALLEN Parker | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 104 | PARK Layne | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 104 | CANNON Rowen | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 106 | ZHANG Weihang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 107 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 108 | PARK Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 109 | MUSSON Miles | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | DEGUZMAN Miguel Javier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 111 | DING Kyen | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 113 | RANGE Easton | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 114 | STERN Kazuki | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 115 | YU Albert | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | MARCISZ Maksym | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 117 | BADMUS David | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 118 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 118 | STYS Owen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 120 | JASPERSON Nolan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 121 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 122 | MISHRA Ayan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.