The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Nash | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% | ||
| 2 | CLARKSON Cole | - | - | - | 11% | 45% | 44% | |
| 3 | WILDERINK Christopher | - | - | 6% | 49% | 38% | 8% | |
| 3 | HAO Anwen | - | 4% | 28% | 56% | 12% | ||
| 5 | SUORSA Markus | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 6 | POFF Kainoa | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 8 | YANG Joshua | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 9 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 10 | CHEN Howard | - | - | 1% | 21% | 53% | 26% | |
| 11 | KANG Evan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 12 | SIU Raymond | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | LI Seth | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | WANG Michael | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ANDERSON Ian | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 17 | UYANIK Muhammet | 9% | 40% | 41% | 9% | - | ||
| 18 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 10% | 42% | 43% | 4% | - | - | |
| 19 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | CHAN Henry | 9% | 43% | 40% | 8% | - | ||
| 21 | XU James | 43% | 45% | 12% | - | - | - | |
| 22 | SEGALE William J. | 22% | 51% | 26% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | ZHENIROVSKYY Oleksandr | 54% | 38% | 8% | - | - | ||
| 24 | TAN Ryan | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 25 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.