The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 2 | WICKBOLDT Eric | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 3 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | LEE Bryson | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 5 | NG Pak Hei Nicholas | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 6 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% | |
| 7 | HEPLER Sarah | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 8 | HEINS Dylan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | ZACHES Torrey | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 10 | CLAES Lucas | 3% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 11 | SINHA Zaan | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
| 12 | SIRBU Dan | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Kai | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 1% | |
| 14 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | - | - | 7% | 36% | 47% | 10% | |
| 15 | SALISTRA Emilia | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 16 | MARIANI Lou | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 17 | TONG Samuel | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 10% |
| 19 | HICKS Zachary | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 1% | |
| 21 | SIU Raymond | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | DU Eiry | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 23 | SIU Darren | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | YUEN Nathan | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | ZGRAGGEN Dale | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | BAUTISTA Raven S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | VASILYEVA Nadia | 6% | 42% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | LOGUE Paul | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 31 | KUO Rylan | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | MADRID Maureen | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | HEISLER Brendan E. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 35 | KUO Michael | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | AHMED Rania | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | EPHRAIM Dennis Malcolm | 2% | 24% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | HIGGINS Calvin | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | PEPPER Alexander | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | AGHAZARIAN Samuel G. | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | MOLTENI Lena | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Rose | 9% | 47% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HOAGLAND Johnathan | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | SMITH Marissa | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | WEBB Jeremey | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.