Summer Nationals and July Challenge

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Saturday, July 4, 2026 at 12:00 AM

Register

Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2488 2612 - 2372
5 - 8 2289 2354 - 2226
9 - 16 1826 2009 - 1752
17 - 26 1522 1719 - 1191

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wandji, Noah A26 2612 2359.68
2 Cheng, Logan Star Fencing Academy A25 2592 2335.93
3 Zhou, Shawn SoCAL Fencing Center B26 2372 2118.27
4 Wu, Wallace Fencers Club Inc. D26 2374 2105.54
5 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing B26 2354 2102.40
6 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center C25 2301 2036.23
7 Ge, Felix Fei Renaissance Fencing Club C26 2276 2023.86
8 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club B25 2226 1972.06
9 Jin, Yucheng LA International Fencing U 2009 1728.50
10 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center E26 1932 1680.34
11 Gudimetla, Siddhanth Team Touche Fencing Center E26 1838 1572.31
12 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club E26 1763 1513.12
13 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1767 1511.85
14 Susanto, William Star Fencing Academy D25 1795 1504.95
15 Lu, Hansen Star Fencing Academy U 1753 1493.33
16 Zhong, Kingsley Star Fencing Academy D25 1752 1492.37
17 Zhang, Eric Star Fencing Academy E26 1699 1445.02
18 Roper, Griffin Rhode Island Fencing Academy And Club U 1712 1419.17
19 Oh, Kepler Maximum Fencing Club E26 1719 1375.65
20 Tan, Alan Altius Fencing Academy U 1656 1374.50
21 Moon, Nolan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1547 1285.41
22 Sha, Laien LA International Fencing U 1551 1263.01
23 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center E25 1360 1075.32
24 Ryu, Griffin Rain City Fencing Center U 1395 1067.08
25 Li, Alex Rain City Fencing Center U 1386 1039.01
26 Wong, Maxwell Star Fencing Academy U 1191 734.57

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!