Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM ELIJAH | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 2 | LI Howard | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | PASTORE LIU Vince | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 5 | HWANG Jayden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 6 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 7 | SAMMI Mukul | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | CAO Oliver | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | KANG Matthew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 10 | SO Preston | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 11 | KANG Jeremy | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 12 | STURGEON Cole | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
| 14 | ZHAO Royce | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | CHEN Jack | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | YOOK Isaac | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | CAO Donald | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | BAI Evan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | XIAO Brayden | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | HO Anson | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | IYER Neil | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | WONG Lucas | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | HOLZ Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | VO Landon | 17% | 43% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | AZADPOUR Arvin | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 28 | MILLER Charlie | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SOULES-ONO Makoa | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | TANG Morgan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | DAI Zihou | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | HWANG Hagan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | SOROKIN Egor | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LIU Daniel | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | WONG David | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | ZHANG Lucas | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MILLS Aidan | 12% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | MUSSELMAN Jasper | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | SMITH Parker | 5% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Hanbit | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | OLSON Kai | 13% | 39% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | KANG Alan | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.