Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
2 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
3 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
3 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
5 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
6 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
7 | SAMMI Mukul | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
8 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
9 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
10 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
11 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
12 | STURGEON Cole | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
13 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
14 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
15 | CHEN Jack | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
17 | CAO Donald | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
18 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
19 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
20 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
21 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
22 | IYER Neil | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
23 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
24 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
25 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
26 | VO Landon | 100% | 83% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | AZADPOUR Arvin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
28 | MILLER Charlie | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | SOULES-ONO Makoa | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
30 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
31 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
32 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
33 | SOROKIN Egor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
35 | WONG David | 100% | 86% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
36 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | MILLS Aidan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
38 | MUSSELMAN Jasper | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | SMITH Parker | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
40 | LEE Hanbit | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
41 | OLSON Kai | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | KANG Alan | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.