Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Serena | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 55% | 16% |
| 2 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 3 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 5 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 6 | XU Jessica | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | SONG Sunny | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 8 | SUN Karolyn | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 9 | ZHAO Yanning | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | CAYETANO Audrey | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | LEE Kaitlyn | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 12 | WU Jessica | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 13 | ZHAO Ellie | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | OLELE Ifechi | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 15 | TREPANIER Georgina | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | MERRIMAN Rie | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | NGUYEN Renee | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | ZHAO Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 19 | CHOI Lydia | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 20 | MOHAN Riya | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 21 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | LEE Adelynn | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LI Anna | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 25 | YU Chloe | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KARTHIK Diya | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | DU Chloe | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | DU Chelsea | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHANG Allison | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 31 | CHEN Julia Z. | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 32 | KOU Cynthia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Madeline | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | XIONG Alice | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | WANG Chantal | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | LI Allison | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | YOUN Kylie | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BERESTOVITSKY Eva | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | DE GRUYTER Hannah | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 40 | WANG Ailly | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | DYMAR Anna | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.