Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 19% |
| 2 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 3 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 5% |
| 3 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | PARK William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 6 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 7 | HARRIS Hayden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | < 1% |
| 8 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
| 9 | WANG sicheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
| 10 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 11 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 6% | |
| 12 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 13 | HE Ian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 14 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 15 | LI Daniel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 16 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 19 | GOERDEL Hitchens | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Yankai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 21 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 22 | GUO Austin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 23 | SHENOY Neil | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | KO Darren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WONG Connor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | WU Silin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 9% |
| 30 | KIM Liam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 32 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 96% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | WANG Waylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 35 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 36 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 37 | FECK Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 38 | WANG Eason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 39 | HUANG Terrance | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | TANG Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 41 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | OH Kepler | 100% | 92% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | CHEN Solomon | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | FECK Shayne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | 8% | |
| 47 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 49 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | |
| 50 | LIN George | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | MURPHY Leo | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 52 | SANCHEZ MARTINEZ Victor Noel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 53 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | JACOB Ezra | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% | |
| 57 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | JIANG Zhuoxuan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 60 | OZCAN Archer | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 61 | SHENOY sean | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | HO Cameron | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | VAZQUEZ Andres Dael | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | EMARA Yaseen | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | HAYS Asher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 66 | MA Justin | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | LI Aaron | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | LEE Colin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 70 | CHAPLUK Thomas | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | EMARA Yousuf | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | LI Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.