Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | BYON Julian | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | KIM ELIJAH | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 3 | KANG Evan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 5 | HWANG Jayden | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 6 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 7 | DUDNICK Christian | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 8 | PLONKA Derek | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 9 | COOK Cole | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 10 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 11 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 12 | HERRERA aragon | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 13 | MUNGUIA Nathan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 14 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | HAO Anwen | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 16 | SUORSA Markus | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 17 | FOX Gavin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 18 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 10% |
| 19 | HOLZ Lucas | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHAO Zhiyu | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | POFF Kainoa | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | HRISTOV Kris | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | HO Anson | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TUNG Ryan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | ZHOU William | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | WANG Zhuoyi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 28 | LESUEUR Luke J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 29 | TSAI Michael T. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | NGO Maximus | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | WEINBERG Harry | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | BRAKEY Ryan | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | NIETO Titus P. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | CHABENAT Guillaume | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 35 | OLARIO Raphael | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 11% | 31% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WONG Lucas | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | TAN Ryan | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ZHONG Xuan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | ZOLLER Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 41 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 42 | CHAN Henry | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 43 | VO Landon | 14% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | GARDNER David | 1% | 16% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ROJAS Alejandro Joaquin | 17% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | CENTENO Zachary | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | FERGUSON Constantine | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 48 | ANUMULA Aryan | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | IYER Neil | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | XU James | 7% | 40% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN Elliott | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SUNG Julian | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WONG David | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | DE GUZMAN Earl Andrew | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | HENRY Ethan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | STONE Brad | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.