Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 2 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 5 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | PLONKA Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 9 | COOK Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 10 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 11 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 12 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 13 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 14 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 15 | HAO Anwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 16 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 17 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 18 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 19 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | HO Anson | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 26 | ZHOU William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 28 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 29 | TSAI Michael T. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | WEINBERG Harry | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | BRAKEY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | CHABENAT Guillaume | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
| 35 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 36 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ZHONG Xuan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | ZOLLER Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 41 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | VO Landon | 100% | 86% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | GARDNER David | 100% | 99% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ROJAS Alejandro Joaquin | 100% | 83% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 82% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | IYER Neil | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | XU James | 100% | 93% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WONG David | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | DE GUZMAN Earl Andrew | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | HENRY Ethan | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | STONE Brad | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.