Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
2 | SUN MANRONG | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
3 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
3 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
5 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | |
6 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
7 | KIM Jayna | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
8 | ZOU ZIXI | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
9 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
10 | BARBARA Camille | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
11 | BEAVER Ava | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
12 | CHA Eugenie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
13 | CHIEM Karen | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
14 | KUKVA Taisiya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
15 | CHEN Jingyun | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
16 | HEPLER Sarah | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
17 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
18 | LIANG Jingjing | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
19 | LAI Amanda | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
20 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
21 | SYKES Elynor | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
22 | LIU Baihan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
23 | DUONG Zoey | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
24 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
25 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
26 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
27 | SALISTRA Emilia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
28 | WANG Jessie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | DALEY Keira | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | LEE Samantha X. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
31 | MUN Brianna K. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
32 | HAU Olivia | 2% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | FAN Elizabeth | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
34 | WANG Victoria | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
35 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | CARRIER Meredith | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
37 | ENRILE Erica | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
38 | JAMES Ashley | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
39 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
40 | XU Celina | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
41 | CHANG Abigail | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
43 | BROWN Riley | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
44 | RALSTON Katherine | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | ZHUANG Lauren | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
46 | COHEN Shaina | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.