UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
2 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
3 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
5 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
5 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
7 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 17% |
8 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
9 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% |
10 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
11 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
12 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
13 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 8% |
14 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
15 | XIE Buster | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
16 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | 3% |
17 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
19 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
20 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
21 | NYKAMP Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 13% | - |
22 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
23 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
26 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
28 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
29 | HAN Ethan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
30 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
30 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
30 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
33 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
34 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | POGOSIAN Roman | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
36 | LINDOW Connor | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
37 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | NAZARIO Dominic | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita I. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.