UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 2 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 3 | LIU Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% |
| 5 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 34% |
| 6 | SUN Ryan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | STRINGER David | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 26% |
| 8 | REEVES Liam | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 61% | |
| 9 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
| 9 | XIE Buster | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | 1% |
| 11 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 53% | 18% | |
| 13 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 14 | SLUSHER Gideon | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 15 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | TAN Connor | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | TOWNE Benjamin | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | HEYBOER Jason | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 3% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | TAMIYA Masao | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | LEE Ian | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | KUE Temujin | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | FINDLAY Zachary | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | REAUME Nate | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | NAZARIO Dominic | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | DUNLAP Ian | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KNIBBE Nathan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 28 | LIU Yinhong | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KIM Daniel | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 30 | HICKEY Connor | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | TATE Liam | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | HAN Ethan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 34 | MAVANI Krishna | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GOGOI Kavi | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | FRASER Rhys | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 37 | LINDOW Connor | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | NI Aaric | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZMUDA Aiden | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WENGER Liam | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.