UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 6.0 | 6 | - |
| 2 | SENIC Lucas | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | LIU Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | MCISAAC Finn | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | SUN Ryan | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | STRINGER David | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | REEVES Liam | V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 9 | GUTH Joseph | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 9 | XIE Buster | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | CHUANG Oscar | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | ALLEN Henry G. | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | MASSIMINO Andrew | D V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | SLUSHER Gideon | V V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | TAN Connor | D D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | TOWNE Benjamin | V V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | HEYBOER Jason | V V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 20 | TAMIYA Masao | V V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | LEE Ian | V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 22 | KUE Temujin | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | FINDLAY Zachary | V D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 24 | REAUME Nate | D D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | NAZARIO Dominic | D V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | DUNLAP Ian | D V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | KNIBBE Nathan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | LIU Yinhong | D D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | KIM Daniel | D V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | HICKEY Connor | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | D V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 32 | TATE Liam | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | HAN Ethan | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 34 | MAVANI Krishna | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | GOGOI Kavi | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | FRASER Rhys | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | LINDOW Connor | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | NI Aaric | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 39 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 40 | ZMUDA Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 40 | WENGER Liam | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.