Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 2 | KOROL Neta | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
| 3 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 3 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 5 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
| 6 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 7 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% |
| 9 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 10 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | LEE Allison | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 14 | HO Addison | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 16 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 18 | FUNG Vera | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 18% |
| 19 | DO Leila | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | ANBARLILAR Fatima Zehra | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | KO Claire | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 36% | 4% |
| 23 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | REN Kayley | 2% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 26 | ZHENG Zoe | 4% | 44% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | HSU Kaylin | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 28 | OH Ceana | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 29 | LENK Sophie | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MCBRYAN Teresa N. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
| 31 | SUN Emily | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 32 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | WU Kyra | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 34 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 36 | WYNN Kylie | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | GARCIA Ivanna C. | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 6% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | DENG Melissa | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | LIU Samantha | 15% | 50% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Ivy | 8% | 44% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | DESAI Esha | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | PATTERSON Natalia | 9% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | RAO Sonia D. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | CHANG Janelle | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | WANG Celine S. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | GUO Audrey | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | MCKAY Teresa | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | MORALES Paulina | 1% | 15% | 44% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | WU Chingfei Amber | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | NEWELL Maggie A. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MCBRYAN Pamela A. | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.