Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | LEE Natasha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 6 | LEE REGINA | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 7 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 8 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 9 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 10 | BALOGH Bella | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 11 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 1% |
| 12 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 13 | KIM Jayna | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | PECK Maia A. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | YAO Yilin | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | WANG Angelina | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | - |
| 17 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 19 | WANG Zoe | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 21 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 22 | LEE Camilla | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | KUKVA Taisiya | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Jessie | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | BUSH Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 28 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 2% |
| 29 | ENRILE Erica | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 30 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | KWON Tiara | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 3% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 33 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 34 | LEE Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 35 | PHUKAN Indra | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 36 | WANG Victoria | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | DARANOUVONG Logan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 39 | CHIMIENTI Michele | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | CHANG Celine A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 40 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LAI Amanda | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MARSH Janet L. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 44 | SALISTRA Emilia | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | BUENROSTRO Cindy C. | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | DALEY Keira | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | DUONG Zoey | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | LIN Ariel | 2% | 14% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 50 | LIANG Jingjing | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHAN Allison M. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 52 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | CHUNG Penelope | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHANG Abigail | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | JAMES Ashley | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SAYSON Samantha | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 57 | SCANLAN Claire | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MADRID Maureen | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | WONG HIN SANG Annabelle | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SANDERS Charlotte | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | TORRES Ava | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | ZHU Riley | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.