Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% |
| 2 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 26% |
| 5 | SUN Emily | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 6 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 47% | 33% | |
| 7 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 8 | HO Addison | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 10 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 10% |
| 11 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 12 | OH Ceana | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 48% | 26% | |
| 14 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 36% | |
| 15 | FUNG Vera | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 16 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 18 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 46% | 10% |
| 19 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 23% | |
| 20 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | LEE Allison | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 22 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 2% | 23% | 46% | 25% | 4% | |
| 23 | WANG Celine S. | 1% | 16% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | GARCIA Ivanna C. | 1% | 16% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 26 | RAO Sonia D. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | REN Kayley | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 28 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 29 | DENG Melissa | - | 6% | 42% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
| 31 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | WYNN Kylie | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KO Claire | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 35 | WELBORN Calissa | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
| 36 | SHUM Maya | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | CHOI Sophie | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 39 | GUO Audrey | 17% | 59% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | YIN Helen | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 34% | 7% | |
| 41 | PATTERSON Natalia | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LUH Mia P. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHOI Kailyn | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ESTRADA Alondra Maria | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | WU Chingfei Amber | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LIU Samantha | 15% | 67% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Ivy | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | MCKAY Teresa | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZONG Melody | 13% | 52% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MORALES Paulina | 8% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | LENK Sophie | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | DESAI Esha | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | FONG Kristy | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHANG Janelle | 69% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SINGH Sania | 79% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | BUI Aubrie | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | LAY Apollonia | 16% | 44% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | CAMPOS Camila | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 60 | DURR Strahlia Devi | 43% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.