Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 2 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 3 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% |
| 5 | SUN Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 6 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | |
| 7 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 8 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 9 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 10 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 11 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 12 | OH Ceana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 13 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 26% | |
| 14 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
| 15 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 16 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 16% |
| 18 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 10% |
| 19 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 23% | |
| 20 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 22 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 29% | 4% | |
| 23 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | GARCIA Ivanna C. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 26 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 28 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 5% |
| 31 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | WYNN Kylie | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 35 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% |
| 36 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 37 | CHOI Sophie | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 39 | GUO Audrey | 100% | 83% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | YIN Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | 7% | |
| 41 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ESTRADA Alondra Maria | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 85% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZONG Melody | 100% | 87% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | FONG Kristy | 100% | 82% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHANG Janelle | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SINGH Sania | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | BUI Aubrie | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | LAY Apollonia | 100% | 84% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | CAMPOS Camila | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 60 | DURR Strahlia Devi | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.