SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | |
| 3 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 5 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 6 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 7 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 8 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
| 10 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 6% | |
| 12 | JI Derek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 6% | |
| 12 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 14 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 16 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 19 | PAN Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SHAW eric | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | ZHANG Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 23 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | |
| 24 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 25 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | OH Joshua | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 31 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | XIA Philip | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
| 34 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
| 36 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 37 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 38 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHONG Albert | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | HARRY Landen | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | |
| 44 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 46 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | PANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 48 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | DAVIDSON Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 50 | MORRIS Micah | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 52 | HERBERT Ethan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | 12% | 1% | |
| 53 | RAJAT Rivaan | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | HARRY Ryan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 57 | DING Charlie | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 100% | 99% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.