La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | REDDY Shreya | D V D V V | V V V V V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 2 | CAO Stephanie X. | V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 3 | MILLER Tiffany D. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KONG Vera | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | SHIN Andrea Y. | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 6 | DESAI Maya D. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 6 | VESTEL Mira B. | V V V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 8 | HILL Julia W. | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | MARSEE Samantha | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 11 | COIMBRA Miya Y. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 12 | CHIN Erika J. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 13 | LACSON Sarah | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | YAP Madeline | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | TANG Catherine H. | D D D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 17 | CHAN Audrey | V V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 17 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | V V V V D V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | LEE Alexandra B. | V V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 20 | SHEN Sarah | V V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | IYER Mohini R. | V D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 22 | LEE Erin Y. | V V D D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | KONG Isabel | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | DUNLAP Allison N. | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | ERIKSON Kira R. | V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | TENG Christine Renmei | V D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | CODY Alexandra C. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | KIM Emily | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | CHOU Dana C. | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | SEAL Julie T. | V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | ROGERS Pauline E. | D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | KIM Catherine | D D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 33 | XU Ellen | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | GULATI Ria | D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 35 | GEYER Carolina M. | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | D V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 37 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | BUHAY Rachel T. | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 39 | PLONKA Kaley V. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 40 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 41 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 42 | PATEL Riya | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 43 | RAHIM Alina O. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 44 | GOMES Gisela | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 45 | ORICCHIO Madeleine | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.