La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HADLER Benjamin N. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | DIVITO Dylan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | LEE Benjamin H. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | KIM Brandon J. | V V D V D | V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
5 | HEER Damanjit S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
6 | RANADIVE Rishi R. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
7 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
8 | OH Samuel H. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | SOHN Christopher | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
10 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
11 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
12 | FORTNER Lance R. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
13 | ZHENG Alan H. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | CATLIN Adam | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
15 | KUMBLA Samarth | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
16 | MORALES Ian N. | V D V D D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
17 | CHIN Jason Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
19 | LEVY Jacob M. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
20 | PAEK Alex J. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
21 | THAI William | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
22 | LAO Scott E. | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
23 | SOTO Ulises G | D V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
24 | PETERS Nathan M. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | BURKE Spencer W. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
26 | AVRON Case B. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
27 | LAI Christopher W. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
29 | DAVIS Christopher M. | D D V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | NGUYEN Nish | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
31 | PATINO Yahir | D D V D V | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
32 | CHENG Matthew S. | V D D V D | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
33 | FUNK Theo S. | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
34 | KELLY Benjamin J. | D V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
35 | XIAO Anthony | V V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
36 | PIESNER Joshua C. | V V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
37 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
38 | WONG Anthony M. | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
39 | JEON Caleb A. | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
40 | WU Conrad J. | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
41 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | D V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
42 | JORDON Kaleb W. | D V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
43 | KIM Aaron J. | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
44 | ALFARO Sergio Raul O. | V V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
45 | FARQUHARSON Cole | V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
46 | MAO Connor | V D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
47 | BARTEL Jacob L. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
48 | JEON Nathan S. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
49 | NGUYEN Jett | D D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
50 | WANG Andrew | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | KIM Isaiah G. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
52 | CHAN Anthony | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
53 | ARNOLD Oscar A. | D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
54 | YU Anders | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
55 | HSIUNG Richie | V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
56 | KIM Banseok | D D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
57 | RYOU Aiden | D D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
58 | LUNA Emilio | D V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
59 | REDDINGTON aidan | D D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
60 | DARIANO Noah G. | V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
61 | WOMACH Tristan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
62 | NG Eben S. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
63 | CHEN Wilson | D D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
64 | LIM Charles Q. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
65 | VARGAS Bryan | V V D V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
66 | AMICO Julian F. | D D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
67 | SCHENCK Theo | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
68 | XIAO EDWARD | D V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
69 | MO Jason | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | NAM Michael | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
71 | GOBBO Alexander | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
72 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
73 | GOLDADE Luke A. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
73 | DORMAN Patrick | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
75 | SWEENEY Quinn | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
76 | SHERMAN Marco J. | V D D D D D | D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
77 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
78 | OLARU-HAGEN Eric | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
79 | HUANG Kevin D. | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
80 | NA Larry | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
81 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
82 | CHEN Brian | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
83 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
84 | JEFFERY Jakob | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
84 | LI Avery Peihong | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
86 | HARRIS Rhonen | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
86 | PETERSON Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
88 | WONG Louis | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.