La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | NOBLE Daniel | D V V V D | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | CHO Justin W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 3 | PARK Justin W. | V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 5 | WINKLER Lucas G. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | KIM Shawn J. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 7 | OSTER Keegan J. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 8 | TAO Stone Z. | V D D V D | V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 9 | CASTRO-SOLIS HUGO ABEL | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | BARBER William S. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | RAJA Arnav | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | ROBERTS Sam | V D V V V | V V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 13 | KIM Andrew H. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | SINGER Carson | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | YANG Kevin S. | D D V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 16 | LE Hayden | V D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | BAILEY Asher | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 18 | ALKIN Isaac | D V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | TANG Alex Y. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 20 | LI Joshua L. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 21 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | BREIER Satchel E. | D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | RABINKOV Anthony | V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 25 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 26 | KIM Benjamin H. | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | TANN Justin | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | REYES Xavier M. | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | PORTMANN Stein J. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 30 | JINICH Ilan R. | D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | FLORES Peter D. | D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 32 | HASNAH Henry | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | JIANG Anthony | D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 34 | LLAMAS Diego F. | V D V D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 35 | GAO Ethan | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 36 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | V V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | REED Samuel J. | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | SARIPALLI Satvik | D V D D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 39 | AVAKIAN Alec | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 40 | VAUGHN Michael R. | D V D V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 41 | GRIFFIN Nicholas D. | V D D V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 42 | LIU Christopher X. | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 43 | BAILEY Nate | D V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | HODGES Calvin | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 45 | SWORDS Evan F. | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 46 | KORINTH Alexander J. | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | CHANIN Liam R. | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | VAUGHN Justin T. | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 49 | WANG CIHANG | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 50 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | CHOI Jaemin | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 52 | VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 53 | SALAKHLY Mark | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 54 | BRISTOL Brijen | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 55 | TIEU Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 56 | DAVIS Oliver | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 57 | SIVAKUMAR Ashwin | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 58 | LI Chengyu | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 59 | DHANANI Zain | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.