Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Sarah | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | FENG Ge | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 3 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 3 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 5 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 5% |
| 6 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 39% |
| 7 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 8 | SONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 9 | AZMEH Nour | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 10% |
| 10 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
| 11 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 2% |
| 12 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 48% | |
| 13 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 20% | |
| 14 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 15 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 40% | 5% |
| 17 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 35% | 6% |
| 19 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 2% | 18% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LEE Claire | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 2% |
| 21 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 50% | 36% |
| 22 | MONOVA Lilyana | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 24 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 25 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% |
| 26 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 27 | REKEDA Anna | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | CHEN Alicia | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 30 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 25% |
| 31 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 6% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 1% |
| 32 | BI Michelle | 12% | 53% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | PARSONS Mischa | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | LI Fei | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 46% | 16% | |
| 35 | TRAN Helena | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 36 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% |
| 37 | WANG Sophie Y. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MARTINEZ Cecilia | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BRUNSON Nile | - | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 40 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SEREGIN Katya | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | FENG Iris | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 44 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Trinity | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 46 | KAUR Manroop | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | YANG Charlotte | 3% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | LI Yixin Catherine | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 49 | GAVILANES Madyson | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | CHANG Chloe | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | HOAGLAND Sally | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | XIE Fiona | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | PAN Angela | 2% | 22% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | KUANG LEIYIN | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | HE Lizbeth | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 58 | TRAN Katherine | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | WANG Selina | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | SKLAR Davida | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SHEAHAN Emma | 70% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | FANG Kayla | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | MILLER Cassandra | 33% | 50% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | CARBERRY Morgan | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | LIU Ilana | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 66 | DENG Joy | 32% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | KENNON Katherine | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | IMRAN Jannat | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.