Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
2 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | |
3 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
3 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
5 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
6 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
7 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
8 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
9 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
10 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
11 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
12 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 27% | |
13 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
14 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
15 | SION Andrew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
16 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 44% | 7% |
17 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | |
18 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
19 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
20 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 7% | |
21 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
22 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
23 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
24 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
25 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
26 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
27 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
28 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
30 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | - | |
31 | WU Isaac | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | |
31 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
33 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
34 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
35 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
36 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
37 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
38 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
39 | ZHANG Gavin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
40 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
41 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
42 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
43 | WANG Ralph | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - | |
44 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | |
45 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
46 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
48 | DAILEY Noah | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
50 | WANG ZEYU | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
51 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
52 | DEROSA Patrick | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
53 | HOWARD Fox | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
54 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | |
55 | DHOTE Meetansh | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
56 | CHUN Alexander | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
57 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
59 | HU Daniel | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
60 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | BO Aiden | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
62 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
63 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
64 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.