Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 3 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 3 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 5 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
| 6 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 7 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 8 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | CHON Collin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 10 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 11 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 12 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 13 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 14 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 7% | |
| 15 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% | |
| 16 | SEN Christian | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 18 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | |
| 19 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 20 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | SHAH Sajan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
| 25 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
| 26 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 27 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 28 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 29 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 30 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 31 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 9% | |
| 32 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GONG zihao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 35 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 37 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 38 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 42 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | POWER Alex | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LIN Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
| 45 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 46 | YOSHEA Henry | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 48 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 49 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 50 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | AO Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 53 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 54 | SAGE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 55 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 57 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 57 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 60 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 61 | LEE Griffin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 62 | CAMPBELL Tobias | 100% | 93% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | 100% | 78% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 64 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 65 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 66 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 94% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | CHA James | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | HE Bowen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 69 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | ANSARI Umayr | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 71 | COURTIN Frederic | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | NAYAK Surin K. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | BECKWITH Charlie | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 74 | BUCK Maximilian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | MAPES Tanner | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | HSU Aiden | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 79 | EPLETT Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | ENGERRAN Michael | 100% | 63% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 82 | LOO Jason | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | 1% | |
| 83 | SMITH William | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | BHERWANI Ishaan | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | COGLIANO Max | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | BRUMBAUGH Alex | 100% | 62% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | DICARLO Vincent | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | ARMSTRONG Nathaniel | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | YEHE-NARA William | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.