Alliance fencing Academy - Houston, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EDWARDS Auprell | V D V V D V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 2 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SHIV Avni | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | YAO Melinda | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | ZHANG Victoria R. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 8 | YILMAZ Pinar | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | PADHYE Tanishka | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | NEMETH Katherine | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | BARG Daniella | V V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | YOUNG VIVIAN | V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | SENYUVA Su | V D V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | NAKA Emily | D V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | LISCUM Vivian | D V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | BARG Margaret | D V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 18 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | D D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | SUN Renee R. | V V D V D D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 20 | KANASKAR Ila | D D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 21 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | V D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | TANG RUIRUI | D V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | QIAN Irene | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 25 | GEVA Eliana | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | MCQUEEN Morgan | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | ZHAN Clare | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 28 | GAUR Ishi | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 29 | CHENG Wanrong | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 30 | KALGAONKAR Arohi | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 31 | AWALEGAONKAR Saina | D D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | YARLAGEDDA Nitya | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | NICHOLS Leelah | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
| 34 | IRFAN Shifa | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.