Alliance fencing Academy - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | BARG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
| 3 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
| 5 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 6 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 7 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 9 | CARDENAS Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 10 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 11 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 12 | LI Tristan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 14 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 15 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 17 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% | |
| 18 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | VINOTH Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 2% |
| 20 | LEE Edward | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | COHEN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 25 | MANGAN Hunter | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | RAO Neil | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | KUANG Bryan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | QIAN Irvine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | RICE Timothy | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LU Haoyang | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 32 | DECKER Hunter | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | MULDOON Thomas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 35 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | POHL Philip | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | HUANG Ethan | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | SATHYAN Dev | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | FENG Ethan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.