Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SINHA Zaan | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | KENT V David | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | WU Alistair | V D D D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 5 | HARR Carver | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | DANIELS Jonah | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 9 | MCADOO Declan | V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 10 | SPITLER Ansel | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | MILEY Walker | D V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 12 | NOFZIGER Bennett | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 13 | CUMMINGS Kai | V D D V D V | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 14 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | SHULL Marc | D D V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 16 | FERRELL-CARRETEY Elliot | D D V D D D | V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 17 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V V V V V D | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 18 | EYMAN Hans | V V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | HEADRICK Jack | V V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | MALLON Jaxson | V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | V D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | HERRON Jonathan | D D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | LEE DoWon | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | HENSLEY Roran | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | CHENG Trevor | V V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 26 | SUN Neo | D V D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 27 | MILLER Mason | D D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 28 | WACHS Bryce | D V D V D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 29 | SIM Ian | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | V D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 31 | WILSON Trevor | V D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 32 | MCDONALD Connor | D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 33 | KENT IV David | D V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 34 | EMERSON Zachary | D D D D V V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 35 | ANDERSON Donald | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 36 | BALDWIN Alexander | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | GEISLER Grahm | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 38 | REID Wesley | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | FREGGER Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 40 | HAALAND Josef | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.