The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOELL Ethan | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 2 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
| 3 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | LU Alex | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
| 5 | WANG Tiger | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 6 | CHANG Jeremy | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 8 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 9 | SUAREZ David | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
| 10 | YOU Alan | - | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 11 | OZAWA Taishi | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 17% |
| 12 | TAN Charlie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% |
| 13 | GE Felix Fei | - | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 14 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | FANG Haoyu | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 16 | LATORRE Leonardo | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 17 | KIM Gene | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% |
| 18 | ZENG Albert | 1% | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | SYMMANK Callen | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | WU Wallace | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 22 | ZHENG Lerui | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Caleb | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | LINEBERRY CADEN | - | 9% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | KUANG Cyrus | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 26 | HUYNH Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 27 | CHANG Parker | - | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | PAN Ethan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% |
| 30 | WEI Winston | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HONG Edwin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 32 | WENGER Rowan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | HUYNH Kaleb | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHOU Justin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | DIFRANK Avery | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | LI Andy | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ZHAO Jason | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | WATERFIELD Lysander | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | CHAN William | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | NAIDL Micah | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 41 | MCGRATH Milo | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | BEYDOUN Sam | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GRIGORYAN Erik | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | DIFRANK Tae | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 46 | CHASE Crosby | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | SHAH Aadi | 21% | 46% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | HOARE Gabriel | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | CRONK Trevor | 21% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHANG Hanson | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | DANTON Ryan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 52 | TAGORE Ayansh | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GUGALA Frank | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | XU Rambert | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DURAI Dheeraj | 23% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GREULICH Nikolas | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | KOTCH Brodie | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 58 | NG Gavin | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 52% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | HAN JINHA | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 61 | HOLMES Elston | 60% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | ALTENHOF Nathaniel | 28% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LIM-SEIWERT Cassian | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.