The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

SoCal Scholastic Fencing League Individual Foil #1

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:00 AM

Chaminade High School - West Hills, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DINSAY Kristjan - - - 1% 11% 48% 40%
2 RAINS Jackson T. - - 4% 20% 40% 32% 4%
3 KIM Sullivan - - - 5% 33% 62%
3 BELTRANSOLORZANO Jared - 5% 22% 38% 26% 7% 1%
5 ROSE Jacob W. 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - < 1%
6 LAKE Wyatt J. - - 1% 7% 30% 47% 16%
7 GAUTHIER-PARKER Harrison - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
8 TSAO Holden 2% 16% 37% 31% 12% 2% -
9 BARTON Trent - 1% 5% 20% 39% 29% 6%
10 KEITH Hudson - 2% 12% 35% 40% 11% 1%
11 MONTGOMERY Georgie 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4% -
12 ISMAGILOV Max - - - 2% 14% 48% 36%
13 WEINBERG Harry - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
14 YORK Lucas 3% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
15 SMITH Jeremiah 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
16 LEE Benjamin - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
17 MCCARVILL Cooper 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% < 1%
18 O'GARA Theodore - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
19 TURNER Finian 22% 42% 27% 7% 1% < 1% -
20 FLANAGAN Miles 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 2%
21 FURBERG Maxwell - - 1% 6% 30% 52% 12%
22 MITCHELL Max 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
23 PONTOPPIDAN Erik 4% 22% 38% 28% 8% -
24 HERMAN Max - - 3% 13% 32% 36% 15%
25 CROUTCH Justin 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
26 CHARETTE Matthew - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14% 1%
27 JONES Rodney - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
28 TRUJILLO Jonah 47% 40% 12% 2% - - -
29 REECE Chapin 2% 16% 35% 33% 13% 2%
30 AGUILAR Keops - 5% 21% 38% 29% 6%
31 THORNTON Maximilian 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
32 HUNTINGTON Charles 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
33 GRACZYK James 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
34 COLLIGAN Apollo 3% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
35 SHULEPOV Nikita 14% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -
36 CHEUNG Tian Yi Tim - 2% 12% 30% 35% 17% 3%
37 DACKO Nolan 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
38 BISSADA Matthew 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 1% -
39 MARQUEZ Gabriel - 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2%
40 VAN HEERDEN Matthew 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
41 ROMANA Colin 1% 13% 37% 34% 12% 2% -
42 KANT Jasper 1% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
43 ADAMS Logan 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
44 SAUTER Luke 38% 43% 16% 2% - - -
45 SOLOMON Wolf - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
46 STASHWICK Tilly 2% 14% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
47 SALVADOR Antonio 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
48 BRISTING Matthew 7% 36% 38% 16% 3% - -
49 MARCUS Ayden 1% 6% 20% 32% 27% 11% 2%
50 MARQUEZ Jacob 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
51 CAMP Ryder - 5% 20% 35% 29% 9% 1%
52 GREENBURG Jackson 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
53 CALDERON Gustavo 2% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1%
54 DIAZ Zahir 1% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6% 1%

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.