Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU MiEr | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 2 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 3 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 3 | ZHANG Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 5 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% | 3% |
| 6 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 7 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | |
| 9 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 10 | HU Charles | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 11 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 13 | HOLDEN Harrison | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 16 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 41% |
| 18 | LU Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 19 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | LI Bryan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | JU Shang | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | |
| 25 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 26 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | MA kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
| 31 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHAN Nathan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 35 | YANG Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 36 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 39 | ENG Kaden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | CHEN Nathan Xingchen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | WANG Franklin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG William | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | YE Andrew | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | YANG Rony | 100% | 67% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | POST Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 49 | LIN Logan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | NIU Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 3% |
| 51 | LO Stefan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | LI Nathan | 100% | 75% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHANG William | 100% | 65% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | GAN Samuel | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | AKKARA Skyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | SALZER Aage | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | YOON Ian | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 62% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | BRANDWAJN Philippe | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.