Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 2 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | LI Sophia M. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 5 | FUNG Vera | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 6 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | LAI Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 8 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 9 | HSU Kaylin | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 10 | CHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | REN Kayley | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHANG Ivy | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | KIM Rachel | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 15 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 10% |
| 16 | CUI alivia | - | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 17 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 18 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 19 | SWANSON Alexa | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | GUAN Adeline | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | HU Jenna | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MU Allison | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 5% | |
| 23 | YANG Audrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 24 | PENG Serena | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 25 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 26 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
| 27 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 28 | HOBSON Ava | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | WYNN Kylie | 2% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
| 31 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | YIN Helen | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 33 | MCKAY Teresa | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YONG Rosalind | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | LENK Sophie | 1% | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | OH Ceana | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | BEAVER Ava | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | WU Chingfei Amber | 16% | 48% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | HO Addison | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 5% | |
| 41 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | TOM Caitlyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | GUO Audrey | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 46 | YUEN Elsie | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | LAY Apollonia | 8% | 49% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | NAIR Supriya | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | ZULUETA Catherine | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | LIU Samantha | 10% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHANG Janelle | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | GOEL Riyana | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | FONG Ellis | 53% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | PATTERSON Natalia | 7% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | DESAI Esha | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | POON Mercedes | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | KRAATZ Kira | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.