Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUO Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
2 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
3 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
3 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
5 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
6 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
7 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
8 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
9 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
10 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
11 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
12 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
13 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
14 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
15 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 10% |
16 | CUI alivia | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
17 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
18 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
19 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
20 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
21 | HU Jenna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
22 | MU Allison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 5% | |
23 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
24 | PENG Serena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
25 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
26 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
27 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 7% |
28 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 97% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | WYNN Kylie | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | ZHANG Soleil C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
31 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
32 | YIN Helen | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
33 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | YONG Rosalind | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - |
35 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | |
36 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
37 | OH Ceana | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
38 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
39 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 84% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 5% | |
41 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
42 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
43 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
43 | GUO Audrey | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
45 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
46 | YUEN Elsie | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
47 | LAY Apollonia | 100% | 92% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | |
48 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
49 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
50 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
51 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
52 | CHANG Janelle | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
54 | FONG Ellis | 100% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
55 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
57 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 100% | 77% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
59 | POON Mercedes | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | KRAATZ Kira | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.