Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
2 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
3 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% |
3 | DENG Melissa | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
6 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
7 | XIE Su | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
8 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
9 | KIM Rachel | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
10 | FUNG Vera | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
11 | OH Ceana | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
12 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 50% | 7% |
13 | GUAN Adeline | - | 5% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
14 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
15 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
16 | LI Sophia M. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
17 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
18 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
19 | WELBORN Calissa | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | MU Allison | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
21 | BHATT Morgane | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% | |
22 | YUEN Elsie | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
24 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | 5% | 25% | 48% | 20% | 1% |
25 | KO Claire | - | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 2% |
26 | SUN Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
27 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
28 | HOBSON Ava | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | CUI alivia | 1% | 8% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 1% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
31 | PENG Charlotte | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
32 | ZHENG Zoe | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | LUH Mia P. | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
34 | ZULUETA Catherine | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
35 | BEAVER Ava | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
36 | LENK Sophie | 4% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | BALCE Cyril | 13% | 46% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | FONG Ellis | 34% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | SEN Arjen | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
41 | CHANG Janelle | 46% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
42 | BOLES Amanda X. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
43 | PATTERSON Natalia | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
44 | GOEL Riyana | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | KAPPAGODA Manel | 2% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
46 | LIU Jessica | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.