Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 3 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | 3% | 36% | 51% | 11% | |
| 3 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 12% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
| 6 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 34% | |
| 7 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | 1% | 11% | 47% | 41% | |
| 8 | LASKA Patryk | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 37% | 8% |
| 9 | MARCUS Peter | - | 5% | 47% | 42% | 7% | |
| 10 | MBERIA Alexander | 16% | 47% | 34% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | MOHOV Aleksey | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% | |
| 12 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 2% | 20% | 52% | 23% | 3% | |
| 13 | LAUER Michael | - | 2% | 21% | 49% | 28% | |
| 14 | STOCK Olivia | 25% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | CRAFT David M. | 2% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 16 | FULLER II Thomas | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | MILLER Jackson | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 26% | 2% |
| 18 | GILL Anhad | 19% | 53% | 27% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | REEN Stephen | 22% | 59% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | HABEGGER Alexander | 23% | 49% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | STAUBITZ Marc | 27% | 64% | 8% | - | - | |
| 22 | PACK Josh | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 23 | ELDRIDGE Darrell | - | < 1% | 3% | 24% | 48% | 25% |
| 24 | MACNEIL Sydney | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | |
| 25 | THARP Jayden | 49% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | WELLS Aenea | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | DUTTON Kimberly | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.