Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 35% |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 3 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 61% | 11% | |
| 3 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
| 6 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 34% | |
| 7 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 41% | |
| 8 | LASKA Patryk | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 45% | 8% |
| 9 | MARCUS Peter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 48% | 7% | |
| 10 | MBERIA Alexander | 100% | 84% | 37% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | MOHOV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 12 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 98% | 78% | 26% | 3% | |
| 13 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% | |
| 14 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | CRAFT David M. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 16 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | MILLER Jackson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 2% |
| 18 | GILL Anhad | 100% | 81% | 28% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | REEN Stephen | 100% | 78% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | HABEGGER Alexander | 100% | 77% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 73% | 9% | - | - | |
| 22 | PACK Josh | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | - |
| 23 | ELDRIDGE Darrell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% |
| 24 | MACNEIL Sydney | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | |
| 25 | THARP Jayden | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | WELLS Aenea | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 26 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.