Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
2 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | |
3 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
3 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% |
5 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
6 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 26% |
7 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 87% | 35% | 6% | - | |
8 | ISHANOVA Sofia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
10 | MARCUS Peter | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
11 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
12 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 84% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
13 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 7% | - |
14 | GOSMEYER Matthew E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 19% | 1% |
15 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | 9% | |
16 | WANG Jim | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
17 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
18 | BATES Austin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | 4% | |
19 | TAN Isabella | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
20 | LEE Claire L. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
21 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
22 | JAMES John | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
23 | VANWORMER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
24 | LASKA Patryk | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
25 | SMITH Aiden | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
26 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | |
27 | DVORAK Ryan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
28 | FRASER Alistair | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.