Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
2 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
3 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
3 | LI Meilin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
5 | YU Lauren C. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
6 | PAVE Claire | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
7 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
8 | TURNER Stephanie E. | - | 1% | 21% | 45% | 28% | 5% | |
9 | DU Hannah | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 31% | |
10 | BASSON Bayley D. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
11 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
11 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
13 | CILLEY Amanda N. | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% | |
14 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
15 | XUE Alanna | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
16 | XU Madison | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
17 | GU EMILY | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
17 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 8% | |
19 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
20 | YU Jaime L. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
21 | JULIUS Sonia | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 26% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | |
23 | SU Michelle | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
24 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | - |
25 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | - | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
26 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
27 | LENZ Zoe N. | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
29 | KANIUK Rachel | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
30 | PAGES Melanie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
31 | CHARALEL Jessica | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | LI Rena | 5% | 33% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
33 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
34 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | ROHRING Anna L. | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
36 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | SCHLOTTERBECK Abigail | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
38 | YEUNG Cherry | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
39 | CHEUNG Kaitlin | 29% | 47% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | KARKHANIS Maya | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
41 | LIN Victoria T. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
42 | SILVER Anna | 37% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | OETZEL Taylor | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
44 | LEE Madison | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
45 | LEE Kaylin | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.