Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | WU Irene M. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | LI Meilin | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 5 | YU Lauren C. | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 6 | PAVE Claire | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | VEERKAMP Molly | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | TURNER Stephanie E. | D V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 9 | DU Hannah | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | BASSON Bayley D. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 11 | HOLLE Aviella S. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | SLASKI Caroline O. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 13 | CILLEY Amanda N. | V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | XUE Alanna | D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 16 | XU Madison | V V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | GU EMILY | V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 17 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | YU Jaime L. | D D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | JULIUS Sonia | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | LIU Sophia | V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | SU Michelle | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | BECCHINA Claire E. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | LENZ Zoe N. | D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | KANIUK Rachel | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | PAGES Melanie | D V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | CHARALEL Jessica | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | LI Rena | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | HUANG NATALIE | V D D V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 | |
| 34 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | ROHRING Anna L. | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 36 | ZGOMBIC Emily | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | SCHLOTTERBECK Abigail | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | YEUNG Cherry | D D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 39 | CHEUNG Kaitlin | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 40 | KARKHANIS Maya | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 41 | LIN Victoria T. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 42 | SILVER Anna | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 43 | OETZEL Taylor | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 44 | LEE Madison | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 45 | LEE Kaylin | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.