Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
2 | LEOU Korina | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
3 | KWON Ava | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
5 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
6 | CHOI Charlotte | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% | |
6 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
8 | NANDA Maanika | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
9 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
10 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
11 | LEE Grace | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
12 | LEE Kaitlin | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% | |
13 | HILD Anya | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
14 | XU Elaine | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
15 | CHAU Zoey | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
16 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
18 | SEO Kaitlyn | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
19 | KIM Grace | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
20 | ZONG Eliane | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
21 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
22 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
23 | MUNSHI Ridhima | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
24 | KATZ Emma | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
25 | KIM Eunjae | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
26 | JUNG Elise | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
27 | PIENKOWSKI Olivia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
27 | JOHN Sophia | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
29 | MALUKI Nia | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
30 | YOUNG Sienna | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
31 | WANG Keira | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
32 | MOFFITT Charlotte | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
33 | LIAO Amber | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
34 | NEGROIU Mara | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
35 | KARAVAS Lucy | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | SPIESS Linnea | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
37 | BAO Amelia | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
38 | SAGER Bianca | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SMITH Genevieve | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | CHI Alicia | 33% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | LAU Angela | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
43 | WANG Chloe | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
44 | LEE Elise | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
45 | DIBADJ Ava | 1% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
46 | CHANG Grace | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
48 | CHEN Chloe | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
48 | PASSMAN Caroline | 2% | 18% | 51% | 25% | 4% | - | |
50 | GOLEN Grace | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.